Morteza Qsmzadeh; Mohammad Ghorbani Joybari
Volume 3, Issue 10 , March 2015, , Pages 101-119
Abstract
In Iranian law, the sale contract consists of two mutual acquisitions formedtogether. These acquisitions are in the same level regarding their positions(Article 338 of Iranian Civil Code).However, in spite of being in the same level, transposition of two acquisitionsare possible, since ...
Read More
In Iranian law, the sale contract consists of two mutual acquisitions formedtogether. These acquisitions are in the same level regarding their positions(Article 338 of Iranian Civil Code).However, in spite of being in the same level, transposition of two acquisitionsare possible, since dichotomy in time of credit affairs allows us to maintaincausing correlation of commitments and to separate them from each other at thesame time. Therefore, although traditional view of legal and jurisprudentialissues does not accept such a condition, following a new approach and focusingon credit reasons, it is possible to accept transposition in the effect of contracts.The issue examined in this research is that the parties may agree to "temporally"submit the transfer of ownership based on their ‘will’, since the field of creditaffairs follows sides` determination aside from developmental affairs. Based onthe principle of determination prominence and article 10 of the Civil Code, suchagreements should be corrected based on sentences, and hence we should notdeal with law issues by ignoring ‘will’ of parties as a result of inappropriate andphilosophical interpretations.
